United States v. Zemin Lin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2010
Docket09-13584
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Zemin Lin (United States v. Zemin Lin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Zemin Lin, (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13584 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 23, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 09-00026-CR-3-RV

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ZEMIN LIN, a.k.a. Ze Min Lin,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________

(February 23, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Zemin Lin, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Lin’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Zemin Lin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zemin-lin-ca11-2010.