United States v. Zemin Lin

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Zemin Lin

367 F. App'x 61

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 23, 2010·No. No. 09-13584·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Zemin Lin, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief pre[62] pared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lin’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Zemin Lin, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief pre[62] pared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lin’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Zemin Lin, 367 F. App'x 61 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

367 F. App'x 61 (United States v. Zemin Lin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related