United States v. Zapata-Vicente

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Zapata-Vicente

558 F. App'x 305

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2014·No. No. 13-7498·Published

Opinion

Affirmsd by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Rafael Zapata-Vicente appeals the district court’s order denying his mo[306] tion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 86. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zapata-Vicente, No. 3:01-cr-00061-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmsd by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Rafael Zapata-Vicente appeals the district court’s order denying his mo[306] tion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 86. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zapata-Vicente, No. 3:01-cr-00061-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Zapata-Vicente, 558 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

558 F. App'x 305 (United States v. Zapata-Vicente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.