United States v. Zanghi
This text of 163 F. App'x 607 (United States v. Zanghi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Phillip Salvatore Zanghi, II appeals from the two-year sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release.
[608]*608Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Zanghi has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. A pro se supplemental brief and an answering brief have been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zanghi-ca9-2006.