United States v. Zamudio-Orozco
This text of 51 F. App'x 680 (United States v. Zamudio-Orozco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Francisco Zamudio-Orozco appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for distribution of 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Zamudio-Orozco’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the appeal presents no arguable issues. Za-mudio-Orozco did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
[681]*681Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issue, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zamudio-orozco-ca9-2002.