United States v. Zamarripa
This text of 166 F. App'x 887 (United States v. Zamarripa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Elias Zamarripa pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court1 sentenced him to 188 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, Zamarripa’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no non-[888]*888frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F. App'x 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zamarripa-ca8-2006.