United States v. Zachary Hrasky

309 F. App'x 83
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Zachary Hrasky. Read the opinion of the Court — 453 F.3d 1099
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2009·No. 07-3141·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Zachary Hrasky pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He now appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment, asserting that he is seeking a final decision from this court so he can petition the Supreme Court for review of this court’s earlier interlocutory decision in United States v. Hrasky, 453 F.3d 1099 (8th Cir.2006) (reversing suppression of evidence), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2098, 167 L.Ed.2d 812 (2007). In this appeal, Hrasky does not challenge any ruling by the district court. Regarding the suppression issue, we conclude that this court’s prior decision is law of the case and that there is no basis for revisiting it. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Zachary Hrasky, 309 F. App'x 83 (8th Cir. 2009).

309 F. App'x 83 (United States v. Zachary Hrasky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Zachary Hrasky
453 F.3d 1099 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
Petruska v. Gannon University
127 S. Ct. 2098 (Supreme Court, 2007)