United States v. Zachary Hrasky
This text of 309 F. App'x 83 (United States v. Zachary Hrasky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Zachary Hrasky pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. He now appeals the district court’s 1 final judgment, asserting that he is seeking a final decision from this court so he can petition the Supreme Court for review of this court’s earlier interlocutory decision in United States v. Hrasky, 453 F.3d 1099 (8th Cir.2006) (reversing suppression of evidence), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2098, 167 L.Ed.2d 812 (2007). In this appeal, Hrasky does not challenge any ruling by the district court. Regarding the suppression issue, we conclude that this court’s prior decision is law of the case and that there is no basis for revisiting it. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 F. App'x 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zachary-hrasky-ca8-2009.