Home/Eighth Circuit/United States v. Zabel

United States v. Zabel

767 F.2d 928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1985
Docket84-2343
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 767 F.2d 928 (United States v. Zabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Zabel, 767 F.2d 928 (8th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

767 F.2d 928

U.S.
v.
Zabel

84-2343

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

4/4/85

D.S.D.

AFFIRMED**

**

See Local Rule 12

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rickie S. Zabel v. United States Attorney
829 F.2d 15 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Bumgarner v. Bloodworth
768 F.2d 297 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
Joseph L. Bumgarner v. Harry Bloodworth, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Poinsett County, Arkansas Gene Henderson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff for Poinsett County, Arkansas, Joseph L. Bumgarner v. Lohnes T. Tiner, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Practicing Attorney in the State of Arkansas David Burnett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for the Second Judicial District of Arkansas Noyl Houston, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for Poinsett County, Arkansas Bill Caplinger, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a State Informant Patty Bumgarner, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as a State Informant
768 F.2d 297 (Second Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
767 F.2d 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-zabel-ca8-1985.