United States v. Youngblood

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Youngblood. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F.3d 1113
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2000·No. 99-40810·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 99-40810 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40810 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DORA MARIE YOUNGBLOOD,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:99-CR-1-1 -------------------- February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dora Marie Youngblood appeals her sentence for possession of

cocaine with intent to distribute. She argues that the district

court erred in not giving her a three-point reduction under

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and conclude that the district court did not clearly err in

applying these guidelines. The evidence was sufficient to find

that the defendant escaped after her arrest. Although this act

also resulted in an obstruction-of-justice enhancement under

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-40810 -2-

U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, such an enhancement ordinarily indicates that

the defendant has not accepted responsibility. § 3E1.1, comment

(n.4); United States v. Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 691 (5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Youngblood, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Youngblood (United States v. Youngblood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ayala
47 F.3d 688 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)