United States v. Youngblood

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Youngblood

667 F. App'x 755

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 13, 2016·No. No. 15-15229 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, Taylor’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Youngblood’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Youngblood’s motions are DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, Taylor’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Youngblood’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Youngblood’s motions are DENIED as moot.

United States v. Youngblood, 667 F. App'x 755 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 755 (United States v. Youngblood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related