United States v. Youngblood

667 F. App'x 755
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 13, 2016
DocketNo. 15-15229 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 755 (United States v. Youngblood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Youngblood, 667 F. App'x 755 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, court-appointed counsel for Jimmie L. Youngblood in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). In addition, Youngblood has filed two motions for the appointment of substitute counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Taylor’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, Taylor’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Youngblood’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Youngblood’s motions are DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-youngblood-ca11-2016.