United States v. Young

344 F. Supp. 1354, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13990
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedApril 28, 1972
DocketNo. 72-CR-10
StatusPublished

This text of 344 F. Supp. 1354 (United States v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Young, 344 F. Supp. 1354, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13990 (E.D. Wis. 1972).

Opinion

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendant has moved for dismissal of the indictment. He urges that compliance with the federal statutes would require him to waive his fifth amendment right not to incriminate himself.

The indictment charges him with transferring a certain firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5812, 5861(e) and 5871. Mr. Young urges that he would be subject to prosecution by Wisconsin authorities under § 164.01(1), Wis.Stats. (1969), if he had complied with the federal statutes.

In my opinion there is no merit to the defendant’s motion. I considered a closely related claim in United States v. Puntillo, 332 F.Supp. 110, 111 (E.D.Wis.1971). See also United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 604, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed. 2d 356 (1971). I reject the defendant’s claim that he is “boxed in” by the interplay of the state and federal statutes.

Therefore, it is ordered that the defendant’s motion to dismiss be and hereby is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Freed
401 U.S. 601 (Supreme Court, 1971)
United States v. Puntillo
332 F. Supp. 110 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 F. Supp. 1354, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-young-wied-1972.