United States v. Young
40 F. App'x 925
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 2002
DocketNo. 00-6622
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 40 F. App'x 925 (United States v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Young, 40 F. App'x 925 (6th Cir. 2002).
Opinion
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
R. Young v. United States
475 F. App'x 49 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 F. App'x 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-young-ca6-2002.