United States v. Young
Opinion
Walter Devon-Istashma Young appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for aiding and abetting bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. Young contends that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post -Booker 1 rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory sentencing guideline regime condemned in Booker. This argument is foreclosed. See Rita v. United States, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
251 F. App'x 952 (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.