United States v. Young

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 F.3d 349
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2001·No. 00-30730·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30730 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK W. YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-20037-ALL - - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mark

W. Young has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Copies of

counsel’s motion and brief were mailed to Young. Young has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Young, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Young (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)