United States v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 6, 1995·No. 95-50030·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50030

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEROY YOUNG,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. CA-W-94-325 (CR-W-89-145-3)

- - - - - - - - - -

June 29, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The factual and legal bases for Leroy Young's due process

violation claim were available when Young filed his first 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion; therefore, the district court did not abuse

its discretion by dismissing his current motion as abusive under

Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. United

States v. Flores, 981 F.2d 231, 234 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

*

Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Young, (5th Cir. 1995).

United States v. Young (United States v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Abraham Flores
981 F.2d 231 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)