United States v. Young

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2005
• Docket: 04-4850
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLAUDE T. YOUNG, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-144)

Submitted: May 4, 2005 Decided: May 20, 2005

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Stephanie L. Ojeda, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Claude T. Young, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and imposing a thirty-day term of

imprisonment to be followed by thirty-five months of supervised

release. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint

appendix and find that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in revoking Young’s supervised release. See United

States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir. 1999) (stating

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Young, No. CR-97-144

(S.D. W. Va. Sept. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -