United States v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RUTHVEN YOUNG, a/k/a Ra Ra,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7777

ASHBERTH SHERRAN GUERRA,

No. 01-7806

Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DON ANTHONY GUERRA,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-445, CA-96-2874-8-2, CA-97-1193-8-2, CA-97-1194-8-2)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ruthven Young, Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Don Anthony Guerra, Appel- lants Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying

their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Young, Nos. CR-92-445, CA-96-2874-8-2

(D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED