United States v. Young

707 F. App'x 955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2018
DocketNo. 17-11727 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 707 F. App'x 955 (United States v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Young, 707 F. App'x 955 (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jaquan Young appeals the sentence the district court imposed following his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Young argues that the district court clearly erred by imposing a two-level enhancement under section 2Dl.l(b)(l) of the Sentencing Guidelines and by declining to apply a mitigating-role reduction under section 3B1.2. But we cannot afford Young any meaningful relief. Young was sentenced to the statutory-minimum sentence of 120 months of imprisonment. So any error in calculating his advisory guideline range was harmless. See United States v. Chirino-Alvarez, 615 F.3d 1344, 1346 (11th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Chirino-Alvarez
615 F.3d 1344 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 F. App'x 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-young-ca11-2018.