United States v. Younes Nasri
This text of United States v. Younes Nasri (United States v. Younes Nasri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 9 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-55685
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01134-WQH-BLM
v. ORDER
YOUNES NASRI,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
$1,152,366.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX5.280, Held in The Name of Golden Castle Technology Limited; $53,020.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX3.200, Held in The Name of Younes Nasri,
Defendants.
Before: BYBEE, BENNETT, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
The Opinion filed October 29, 2024, and appearing at 119 F.4th 1172 (9th Cir.
2024), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district
court of the Ninth Circuit. Oral argument will be scheduled by separate order, and the court will file a new opinion in due course. Because the court’s opinion is
withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Younes Nasri, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-younes-nasri-ca9-2025.