United States v. Younes Nasri

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Younes Nasri. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 F.4th 1172
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2025·No. 22-55685·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 9 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-55685

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

3:21-cv-01134-WQH-BLM

v.

ORDER

YOUNES NASRI,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

$1,152,366.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX5.280, Held in The Name of Golden Castle Technology Limited; $53,020.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX3.200, Held in The Name of Younes Nasri,

Defendants.

Before: BYBEE, BENNETT, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

The Opinion filed October 29, 2024, and appearing at 119 F.4th 1172 (9th Cir.

2024), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district

court of the Ninth Circuit. Oral argument will be scheduled by separate order, and

the court will file a new opinion in due course. Because the court’s opinion is

withdrawn, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Younes Nasri, (9th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Younes Nasri (United States v. Younes Nasri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Younes Nasri
119 F.4th 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)