United States v. Yonkers Contracting Co.

S.D. New York

United States v. Yonkers Contracting Co.

684 F. Supp. 386, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3516, 1988 WL 39375

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedApril 21, 1988

DocketNo. 87 Crim. 560 (WCC)

StatusPublished

This text of 684 F. Supp. 386 (United States v. Yonkers Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Yonkers Contracting Co., 684 F. Supp. 386, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3516, 1988 WL 39375 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

Defendants, paving contractors in West-chester County, New York, have moved to dismiss the indictment in this case on the ground that the Southern District jury plan, followed in selecting the grand jury which returned the indictment, does not achieve proportionate representation of races and national origins. Specifically, defendants maintain that since the Southern District jury pool is drawn from voter registration lists, it underrepresents poor black and hispanic citizens who, it is claimed, register to vote in smaller percentages than other citizens.

An identical motion to dismiss was filed in a similar criminal case involving contractors in Orange County, U.S.A. v. Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc., 87 Crim. 559 (GLG), which is pending before Judge Goettel of this Court. Similar motions were filed by defendants in U.S.A. v. Guarino (87 Crim. 279) (PNL) [available in WESTLAW, 1987 WL 45643] before Judge Leval, and in U.S.A. v. Biaggi, 680 F.Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y.1988) before Judge Motley. All of these motions to dismiss were denied.

After a careful review of defendants’ papers filed in support of the motion to dismiss, and the Government’s opposing papers, all of which are identical to those filed before Judge Goettel in the Orange County case, the Court agrees with and adopts the thorough analysis and sound conclusions set forth in Judge Goettel’s Opinion and Order dated March 28,1988, and denies the motion to dismiss in this action in full.

A pretrial conference will be held on Thursday, April 28, 1988, at 10:00 A.M. in Room 302 of this Courthouse. The parties are directed to proceed with preparation for trial which is expected to commence as soon as practicable after the trial in Judge Goettel’s case is completed.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.

Defendants, paving contractors in West-chester County, New York, have moved to dismiss the indictment in this case on the ground that the Southern District jury plan, followed in selecting the grand jury which returned the indictment, does not achieve proportionate representation of races and national origins. Specifically, defendants maintain that since the Southern District jury pool is drawn from voter registration lists, it underrepresents poor black and hispanic citizens who, it is claimed, register to vote in smaller percentages than other citizens.

An identical motion to dismiss was filed in a similar criminal case involving contractors in Orange County, U.S.A. v. Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc., 87 Crim. 559 (GLG), which is pending before Judge Goettel of this Court. Similar motions were filed by defendants in U.S.A. v. Guarino (87 Crim. 279) (PNL) [available in WESTLAW, 1987 WL 45643] before Judge Leval, and in U.S.A. v. Biaggi, 680 F.Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y.1988) before Judge Motley. All of these motions to dismiss were denied.

After a careful review of defendants’ papers filed in support of the motion to dismiss, and the Government’s opposing papers, all of which are identical to those filed before Judge Goettel in the Orange County case, the Court agrees with and adopts the thorough analysis and sound conclusions set forth in Judge Goettel’s Opinion and Order dated March 28,1988, and denies the motion to dismiss in this action in full.

A pretrial conference will be held on Thursday, April 28, 1988, at 10:00 A.M. in Room 302 of this Courthouse. The parties are directed to proceed with preparation for trial which is expected to commence as soon as practicable after the trial in Judge Goettel’s case is completed.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 F. Supp. 386, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3516, 1988 WL 39375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-yonkers-contracting-co-nysd-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack