United States v. Yeager

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2002·No. 00-4378·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1R Y  !  s2+1 ) <($*(5  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH6RXWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI2KLRDW&LQFLQQDWL 1Rn6XVDQs'ORWW'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG$XJXVW 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG6HSWHPEHU %HIRUH6,/(5&2/(DQG&/$<&LUFXLWsXGJHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  sRKQ 3 )HOGPHLHU 6,5.,1 3,1$/(6 0(=,%29  6&+:$57= //3 &LQFLQQDWL 2KLR IRU $SSHOODQW0DUF2VERUQH$66,67$1781,7('67$7(6 $77251(< :LOPLQJWRQ 'HODZDUH IRU $SSHOOHH 21%5,()sRKQ3)HOGPHLHU0DUWLQ63LQDOHV6,5.,1 3,1$/(6 0(=,%29  6&+:$57= //3 &LQFLQQDWL 2KLR IRU $SSHOODQW  sRKQ 0 'L3XFFLR $66,67$17 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(< &LQFLQQDWL 2KLR 0DUF

  8QLWHG6WDWHVY

2VERUQH $66,67$17 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(< :LOPLQJWRQ'HODZDUHIRU$SSHOOHH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 23,1,21 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 5 *8< &2/( s5 &LUFXLW sXGJH  'HIHQGDQW sRKQ )

UHTXHVWHG GRFXPHQWV  2YHU WKH QH[W VHYHUDO PRQWKV WKH JRYHUQPHQW SURGXFHG DGGLWLRQDO GRFXPHQWV WR D@W WKHYHU\OHDVWUHSUHKHQVLEOHl $JDLQVWWKHEDFNGURSRIWKRVHIDFWXDOILQGLQJVWKHGLVWULFW FRXUWHYDOXDWHGWKHPHULWVRI

DSSHDOHG WKH GLVPLVVDO RQ 2FWREHU    $OO WROG FRXUW LV WKDW RI DQQRXQFLQJ WKH IDFW DQG GLVPLVVLQJ WKH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Yeager, (6th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Yeager (United States v. Yeager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.