United States v. Yang

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 29, 2001
• Docket: 01-6544
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6544

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KIBUM YANG, a/k/a Danny Yang,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-6837

KIIN YANG,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-99-12, CA-01-171-AM, CA-01-187-A)

Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: August 29, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kibum Yang, Kiin Yang, Appellants Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Kibum Yang and Kiin Yang seek to appeal the district court’s

orders construing their separate petitions for writs of error coram

nobis as motions under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), and

denying the motions as untimely under the one-year limitation

period. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny cer-

tificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Yang, Nos. CR-99-12; CA-

01-171-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2001), and United States v. Yang, Nos.

CR-99-12; CA-01-187-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED