United States v. Yacov Yida, of California

478 F.3d 1068, 2007 WL 610958
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2007·No. 06-10460·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The court invites supplemental letter briefs by the parties and any amicus curiae addressing some or all of the following questions raised in this appeal:

1. Under Fed. R. of Evid. 804(a)(5), what is the appropriate legal standard to be applied when evaluating a witness’s “unavailability”?
2. Under Fed. R. of Evid. 804(a)(5), when assessing the proponent’s efforts to ensure a witness’s presence at the relevant proceeding “by process or other reasonable means,” what is the relevant temporal period in which to assess the proponent’s actions, and does it include a time period in which the proponent may have contributed to a witness’s absence?

Any letter briefs responding to this order shall be filed simultaneously on or before thirty (30) days from the filed date of this order. The briefs shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages (double-spaced) or 4,200 words and shall be in the form of letters to the Clerk of this court. Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 29(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Yacov Yida, of California, 478 F.3d 1068, 2007 WL 610958 (9th Cir. 2007).

478 F.3d 1068 (United States v. Yacov Yida, of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Yida
498 F.3d 945 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Kenneth Kelley
478 F.3d 1068 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)