United States v. Xiao Lin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 12, 2018·No. 17-11255·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-11255 Document: 00514638317 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-11255 FILED Summary Calendar September 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

XIAO CHEN LIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-236-1

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Xiao Chen Lin has appealed the term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court erred by imposing a single revocation sentence when there were two underlying counts of conviction and two underlying periods of supervised release. Our review is for plain error. See United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir. 2009). Because the revocation sentence did not exceed the maximum

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-11255 Document: 00514638317 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/12/2018

No. 17-11255

sentence available for either count, the district court did not commit a clear or obvious error. See Clark v. United States, 367 F.2d 378, 380 (5th Cir. 1966); see also Whitelaw, 580 F.3d at 260. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Xiao Lin, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Xiao Lin (United States v. Xiao Lin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Whitelaw
580 F.3d 256 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
James Edward Clark v. United States
367 F.2d 378 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)