United States v. Wright
Opinion
Kova Duan Wright appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Wright, No. 5:01-cr-00005-RLV-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2011); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — [135] U.S.-, 182 S.Ct. 1003, 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
471 F. App'x 134 (United States v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.