United States v. Worthy Curt Pogue

433 F.2d 363
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 1970
Docket20-10250
StatusPublished

This text of 433 F.2d 363 (United States v. Worthy Curt Pogue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Worthy Curt Pogue, 433 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

433 F.2d 363

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Worthy Curt POGUE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 29926 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 9, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Virgil Pittman, District Judge.

Radney & Morris, Tom Radney, Alexander City, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Ira De Ment, U. S. Atty., D. Broward Segrest, Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 See also Brown v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 769; Anderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 403 F.2d 206; Shoffeitt v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 403 F.2d 991, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1084, 89 S.Ct. 868, 21 L.Ed.2d 777 (1969).

Notes:

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.,See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 F.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-worthy-curt-pogue-ca5-1970.