United States v. Worthy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Worthy. Read the opinion of the Court — 342 F. App'x 877
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2009·No. 09-7419·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Zantwan Devorris Worthy appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Worthy, No. 1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1

(M.D.N.C. July 20, 2009). Further, we deny Worthy’s motion to

consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Worthy, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Worthy (United States v. Worthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.