United States v. Worrell Robotham

980 F.2d 728, 1992 WL 348935
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Worrell Robotham. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 F.2d 888
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 30, 1992·No. 92-6129·Unpublished

Opinion

980 F.2d 728

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Worrell ROBOTHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6129.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 26, 1992
Decided: November 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R)

Worrell Robotham, Appellant Pro Se.

Jean Martel Barrett, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Worrell Robotham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robotham, Nos. CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Worrell Robotham, 980 F.2d 728, 1992 WL 348935 (4th Cir. 1992).

980 F.2d 728 (United States v. Worrell Robotham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related