United States v. Worrell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAVID ISSAC WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Issac Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Issac Worrell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

United States v. Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct.

21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED