United States v. Woody Mallard Raymer
This text of 943 F.2d 50 (United States v. Woody Mallard Raymer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
943 F.2d 50
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Woody Mallard RAYMER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-5278.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.
Decided Sept. 10, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-180-D, CR-90-278-G)
Susan Hayes, Barry S. Stanback, Greensboro, N.C., for appellant.
Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, John W. Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., for appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Woody Mallard Raymer pled guilty to escape (18 U.S.C. § 751) and bank robbery (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)). He appeals the sentence imposed and we affirm.
At his sentencing, Raymer argued for a downward departure on the ground of diminished capacity resulting from his combat service in Vietnam. The district court declined to depart, and imposed a sentence within the guideline range. This Court has previously decided that a decision not to depart is not reviewable on appeal. United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3244 (U.S.1990). We adhere to that view. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. The parties' motion to dispense with oral argument is granted because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
943 F.2d 50, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25503, 1991 WL 173011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-woody-mallard-raymer-ca4-1991.