United States v. Woodson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Woodson

3 F. App'x 59

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2001·No. 00-7229·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson, Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-218-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000), and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson, Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-218-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Woodson, 3 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

3 F. App'x 59 (United States v. Woodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related