United States v. Woods

688 F. App'x 718
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 16, 2017·No. No. 15-14802 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leon Woods, Jr. appeals his 105-month sentence, imposed after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court’ correctly concluded that Woods’s Florida manslaughter conviction was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)’s residual. clause because this Court’s prior precedent establishes the residual clause’s constitutional validity and categorically qualifies Florida manslaughter as a .crime of violence. For background, see United States v. Matchett, 802 F.3d 1185 (11th Cir. 2015); In re Burgest, 829 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2016). In addition, even if the district court committed error, the error was harmless, as the district court stated that it would impose the 105-month sentence as a reasonable sentence, regardless of any Sentencing Guideline calculation; and the sentence was, in fact, reasonable. For background, see United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Woods, 688 F. App'x 718 (11th Cir. 2017).

688 F. App'x 718 (United States v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Billy Jack Keene
470 F.3d 1347 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Calvin Matchett
802 F.3d 1185 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
In Re: Earl Burgest
829 F.3d 1285 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)