United States v. Woods

688 F. App'x 718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 2017
DocketNo. 15-14802 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 688 F. App'x 718 (United States v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Woods, 688 F. App'x 718 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leon Woods, Jr. appeals his 105-month sentence, imposed after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court’ correctly concluded that Woods’s Florida manslaughter conviction was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)’s residual. clause because this Court’s prior precedent establishes the residual clause’s constitutional validity and categorically qualifies Florida manslaughter as a .crime of violence. For background, see United States v. Matchett, 802 F.3d 1185 (11th Cir. 2015); In re Burgest, 829 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2016). In addition, even if the district court committed error, the error was harmless, as the district court stated that it would impose the 105-month sentence as a reasonable sentence, regardless of any Sentencing Guideline calculation; and the sentence was, in fact, reasonable. For background, see United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Billy Jack Keene
470 F.3d 1347 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Calvin Matchett
802 F.3d 1185 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
In Re: Earl Burgest
829 F.3d 1285 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 F. App'x 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-woods-ca11-2017.