United States v. Woods

55 F. App'x 5
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 2003
Docket01-1445
StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 5 (United States v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Woods, 55 F. App'x 5 (1st Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lorenzo Woods appeals from the sentence the district court imposed following his guilty plea to three cocaine base offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. On appeal, he asserts that the district court erroneously applied United States Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1 at sentencing. In addition, he claims that the district court misunderstood its departure authority under Guideline § 4A1.3 and thus failed to grant his motion for a downward departure.

After careful review of the record, in particular the sentencing transcript, we conclude that the court properly applied the career offender guideline, § 4B1.1, at sentencing. To that extent, we affirm the sentence. We also agree with the United States that the district court denied the departure motion in an exercise of its discretion and not based on any misapprehension of authority. Thus, we may not review its decision. See United States v. DeLeon, 187 F.3d 60, 69 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1030, 120 S.Ct. 551, 145 L.Ed.2d 428 (1999) (“It is well settled that ‘no appeal lies from a discretionary refusal to depart’ from the Sentencing Guidelines.”) (citation omitted).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. DeLeon
187 F.3d 60 (First Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 F. App'x 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-woods-ca1-2003.