United States v. Woodfolk

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Woodfolk

19 F. App'x 149

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2001·No. Nos. 01-6560, 01-6621·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to vacate judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) and denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodfolk, No. CR-93-419-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 22, 2001); Woodfolk v. United States, No. CA-01-727-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to vacate judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) and denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodfolk, No. CR-93-419-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 22, 2001); Woodfolk v. United States, No. CA-01-727-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Woodfolk, 19 F. App'x 149 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

19 F. App'x 149 (United States v. Woodfolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.