United States v. Woodall
75 F.2d 1020, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176
This text of 75 F.2d 1020 (United States v. Woodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Woodall, 75 F.2d 1020, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176 (9th Cir. 1935).
Opinion
The record in this case is insufficient to raise the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank, 69 F.(2d) 312, 317. This is the only matter presented by appellant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New York
69 F.2d 312 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 F.2d 1020, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-woodall-ca9-1935.