United States v. Wood
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6461
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee,
versus
WENDELL MASSIE WOOD, a/k/a Crab,
Petitioner - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-128, CA-99-69-7)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999
Before WILKINS, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Keller Leonard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William Edward Findler, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Wendell Wood seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Wood, Nos. CR-94-128;
CA-99-69-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Wood (United States v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.