United States v. Wood

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wood. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 F. App'x 294
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 1999·No. 99-6461·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee,

versus

WENDELL MASSIE WOOD, a/k/a Crab,

Petitioner - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-128, CA-99-69-7)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before WILKINS, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Keller Leonard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William Edward Findler, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Wendell Wood seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Wood, Nos. CR-94-128;

CA-99-69-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wood, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Wood (United States v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related