United States v. Wong Lung

D. Vermont

United States v. Wong Lung

103 F. 794, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173

District Court, D. Vermont·Decided May 4, 1900·Published

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This case shows that the appellant has been a member of a firm of merchants dealing in groceries at Hartford, Conn., for seven years, having $1,000 invested as his share of the capital. This entitles him to remain in the United States. Lau Ow Bew v. U. S., 144 U. S. 47, 12 Sup. Ct. 517, 36 L. Ed. 340. The case also shows that he has lately visited China, and returned, but does not show the manner of his re-entry, nor any connection between his arrest for being unlawfully in the United States and his return, if that would be material as to his right to remain, when actually and peaceably here. Appellant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge.

This case shows that the appellant has been a member of a firm of merchants dealing in groceries at Hartford, Conn., for seven years, having $1,000 invested as his share of the capital. This entitles him to remain in the United States. Lau Ow Bew v. U. S., 144 U. S. 47, 12 Sup. Ct. 517, 36 L. Ed. 340. The case also shows that he has lately visited China, and returned, but does not show the manner of his re-entry, nor any connection between his arrest for being unlawfully in the United States and his return, if that would be material as to his right to remain, when actually and peaceably here. Appellant discharged.

United States v. Wong Lung, 103 F. 794, 1900 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173 (D. Vt. 1900).

Pincite

103 F. 794 (United States v. Wong Lung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related