United States v. Woltz

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Woltz

474 F. App'x 104

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Woltz. Read the opinion of the Court — 427 F. App'x 249 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2012·No. No. 12-6111·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Woltz leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woltz, No. 3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Woltz leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woltz, No. 3:06-cr-00074-WEB-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Woltz, 474 F. App'x 104 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 104 (United States v. Woltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.