United States v. Wisehart

11 C.M.A. 251, 11 USCMA 251, 29 C.M.R. 67, 1960 CMA LEXIS 336, 1960 WL 4460
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 1960
DocketNo. 13,477
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 C.M.A. 251 (United States v. Wisehart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wisehart, 11 C.M.A. 251, 11 USCMA 251, 29 C.M.R. 67, 1960 CMA LEXIS 336, 1960 WL 4460 (cma 1960).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

George W. LatimeR, Judge:

A general court-martial convicted accused of several offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including forgery and uttering a forged cheek, both contrary to Article 123 of the Code, 10 USC § 923. The findings, together with his sentence to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and confinement at hard labor for one year, have been affirmed at intermediate appellate levels, and we granted review limited to the same question of multiplicity before us in United States v Gibbons, 11 USCMA 246, 29 CMR 62, this day decided.

The accused pleaded guilty as charged, but the Government, pursuant to Air Force policy, nevertheless proceeded to introduce evidence establishing his guilt. Included in the prosecution’s evidence is accused’s voluntary pretrial statement, wherein he admitted that on November 3, 1958, he secured a blank check from his room and drew it in his own favor, forging another’s signature to the instrument, and that he later took the check with him to a club, where he negotiated it.

From the above recited facts, it is manifest that we have here exactly the situation which confronted us in United States v Gibbons, supra, and the ruling therein announced is dispositive of the issue herein granted. Accordingly, for the reasons there stated, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Searles
14 C.M.A. 643 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 C.M.A. 251, 11 USCMA 251, 29 C.M.R. 67, 1960 CMA LEXIS 336, 1960 WL 4460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wisehart-cma-1960.