United States v. Wise

639 F. App'x 193
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2016·No. No. 15-2477·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its foreclosure action. We have reviewed the record and find no re[194] versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-cv-00844-FL, 2015 WL 7302245 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2015; Oct. 9, 2015). We deny the pending motion as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wise, 639 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Wise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
E.D. North Carolina, 2026
Pigford v. Veneman
District of Columbia, 2016