United States v. Wise

639 F. App'x 193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2477
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 639 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wise, 639 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its foreclosure action. We have reviewed the record and find no re[194]*194versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wise, No. 5:14-cv-00844-FL, 2015 WL 7302245 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2015; Oct. 9, 2015). We deny the pending motion as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Case
E.D. North Carolina, 2026
Pigford v. Veneman
District of Columbia, 2016

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wise-ca4-2016.