United States v. Winters

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Winters

670 F. App'x 689

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 17, 2016·No. No. 15-15095·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Jermaine Winters, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Jermaine Winters, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Winters, 670 F. App'x 689 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 689 (United States v. Winters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related