United States v. Wilson

28 F. Cas. 724
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedDecember 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 28 F. Cas. 724 (United States v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wilson, 28 F. Cas. 724 (N.D. Cal. 1855).

Opinion

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The claim in this case was confirmed by the board. No doubt is suggested as to the authenticity of the documentary evidence submitted, and the only point upon which a question was made was whether the grant and map accompanying it sufficiently indicate the granted land— there being no designation of the quantity or number of leagues in the original grant. The grant bears date on the thirteenth of November, 1839, but was not issued until the twentieth. The signature of the governor to the original grant is fully proved, and the expe-diente produced from the archives containing the proceedings upon the petition, the various orders of the governor, and the decree of approval by the departmental assembly. The requirements of the regulations of 1828 seem to have been substantially complied with, and the land cultivated and inhabited within a reasonable time. With regard to locating the tract, there seems to be no difficulty. The grant describes it as the parcel of land known by the name of “Guilicos,” within the boundaries shown in the map which accompanies the petition. On inspecting the map, those boundaries appear to be indicated with tolerable certainty, and it is presumed that by means of it no practical difficulty will be found by the surveyor in laying off to the claimant his land. A decree of confirmation must therefore be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Protests 103339-K of Pacific National Bank
15 Cust. Ct. 237 (U.S. Customs Court, 1945)
In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.
207 F. 119 (E.D. Kentucky, 1913)
City of Memphis v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
183 F. 529 (Sixth Circuit, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilson-cand-1855.