United States v. Wilson

258 F. App'x 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 502 F.3d 718
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided December 26, 2007·No. Nos. 04-1594, 04-1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On March 16, 2007, we ordered a limited remand of Darryl Wilson’s and Sammy Armstead’s cases under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005). See 481 F.3d 475. The district court has indicated that it would be inclined to re-sentence Wilson now that it knows the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory. We therefore VACATE Wilson’s sentence and REMAND for a new sentencing hearing. As to Armstead, we will await word from the district court whether it would be similarly inclined to resentence him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, 258 F. App'x 903 (7th Cir. 2007).

258 F. App'x 903 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related