United States v. Wilson

426 F. App'x 323
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 25, 2011·No. No. 10-20182·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph E. Wilson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Wilson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, 426 F. App'x 323 (5th Cir. 2011).

426 F. App'x 323 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Livingston
637 F. App'x 148 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Dennis Thomas v. Alvin Jones
487 F. App'x 924 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)