United States v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 30, 2001·No. 99-20975·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20975

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN FITZGERALD WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-169-1

--------------------

March 26, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent John Fitzgerald Wilson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wilson has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)