United States v. Wilson

132 F. App'x 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 106
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 26, 2005·No. 05-6329·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Allen Wilson has filed an untimely notice of appeal from his September 11, 1997, judgment in a criminal case. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good *454 cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment in September 11, 1997; the notice of appeal was not filed until February 14, 2005. Because Wilson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

To the extent Wilson seeks authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, authorization is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, 132 F. App'x 453 (4th Cir. 2005).

132 F. App'x 453 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)