United States v. Wilson

111 F. App'x 170
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 106
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2004·No. 04-6552·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patrice Behanzin Wilson appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the court. See United States v. Wilson, No. CR-96-34 (E.D.N.C. Jan 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, 111 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2004).

111 F. App'x 170 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.