United States v. Wilson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 F.3d 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 30, 2000·No. 99-7616·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH EARL WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-95-212)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Earl Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Earl Wilson appeals the district court’s order seeking

relief from the court’s prior order declining to allow the Govern-

ment to file an untimely motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, No. CR-95-212

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wilson, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Wilson (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.