United States v. Wilson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Wilson

363 F. App'x 688

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 27, 2010·No. No. 09-12317·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Patrick Wilson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Patrick Wilson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Wilson, 363 F. App'x 688 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

363 F. App'x 688 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related