United States v. Wilson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Wilson

354 F. App'x 417

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 3, 2009·No. No. 09-13297·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Todd Dewayne Wilson, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Todd Dewayne Wilson, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Wilson, 354 F. App'x 417 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

354 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related