United States v. Wilson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Wilson

354 F. App'x 417

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 2009

DocketNo. 09-13297

StatusPublished

This text of 354 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Wilson, 354 F. App'x 417 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Todd Dewayne Wilson, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Randolph P. Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Todd Dewayne Wilson, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wilson-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack