United States v. Willie George Gorsuch, Chester O'Neal Teasley, Titus Philemon Brown, James Edward Warren Willie George Gorsuch

Third Circuit

United States v. Willie George Gorsuch, Chester O'Neal Teasley, Titus Philemon Brown, James Edward Warren Willie George Gorsuch

378 F.2d 937, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6003

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 15, 1967

Docket16284_1

StatusPublished

This text of 378 F.2d 937 (United States v. Willie George Gorsuch, Chester O'Neal Teasley, Titus Philemon Brown, James Edward Warren Willie George Gorsuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Willie George Gorsuch, Chester O'Neal Teasley, Titus Philemon Brown, James Edward Warren Willie George Gorsuch, 378 F.2d 937, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6003 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the record amply sustains the District Court’s holding that the appellant’s motion for reduction of sentence was without merit. The Order of the District Court denying the motion will be affirmed.

It merits observation that the District Court advised the appellant of its disposition of his motion in an “Opinion Letter”. We are of the view that disposition by an “Opinion Letter” is not a desirable practice. A Memorandum Opinion would more adequately conform to established procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we are of the opinion that the record amply sustains the District Court’s holding that the appellant’s motion for reduction of sentence was without merit. The Order of the District Court denying the motion will be affirmed.

It merits observation that the District Court advised the appellant of its disposition of his motion in an “Opinion Letter”. We are of the view that disposition by an “Opinion Letter” is not a desirable practice. A Memorandum Opinion would more adequately conform to established procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

378 F.2d 937, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-willie-george-gorsuch-chester-oneal-teasley-titus-ca3-1967.